Thinking it Through

thinker_flickrDisclaimer: If you are offended by rational examination of cultural hot button issues, this article isn’t for you. This discussion is intended to ask simple questions as well as examine  preconceived ideas and practical outcomes associated with homosexual behavior. Keep in mind that God loves everyone and willingly condemns no one. The purpose is to show the way to better health, wisdom and harmony.

Many people today explain homosexuality as a state rather than an urge. When we call a thing a state, we are identifying a stable condition, often permanent and even hard-wired. Urges, on the other hand, can be momentary and even insignificant ― or they can develop into long-term behaviors. Are we to surrender ourselves to our urges? Which ones shall we go with?

Every day and all throughout our lives, human beings experience urges ― feelings pulling us toward choices. Some are good choices, such as a boy’s desire to hug his mom or to give his sister a gift after they have fought. Other urges compel us toward unhealthy Follow-Your-Heartchoices, such as a boy’s desire to steal a candy bar to satisfy a momentary appetite for sugar. Most adults have sorted through the more basic urges, but we have grown-up ones to replace them: gambling, promiscuity, reckless driving, excessive drinking or a hundred other options that come with urges ― a burst of hormones and an ensuing emotional response that pulls the hapless person toward something he may not think through, particularly if he has bought into the Hallmark sentiment: Follow Your Heart.

We need to ask ourselves why, as a society, we declare some urges unquestionably good and others “bad.” Isn’t our evaluation of urges usually based on the practical outcomes they lead to in our lives? Consider the urges many experience to drink to excess or to seek comfort and pleasure in recreational drugs. We have deemed these urges “bad” because they are associated with poor health, job instability, legal problems and the disintegration of the family. And yet many of us experience strong urges to use substances. Some of us resist them and avoid all the trouble, but many others follow them and experience the whole spectrum of consequences, up to and including death.

We can argue all day long that homosexual urges are good and natural, but do we have a basis for such a conclusion, other than our longing for sexual liberty? If we examine American society’s track record since the Sexual Revolution, we find a dismaying plunge Printinto many social ills: epidemic STDs (sexually transmitted diseases), 60 percent divorce rate, an explosion of single-parent families (strongly associated with poverty and behavioral problems in children), and the general cheapening of sexual intimacy to name a few of the culprits. Are we better off for having given ourselves over to our sexual urges?

But back to the previous question: is it appropriate to equate sexual urges with an unchanging condition? What makes an urge fleeting as opposed to intense and persistent? Usually, our response to that urge. Think about the first time you first felt like smoking a cigarette. A friend or family member offered you one, and you experienced a relatively mild pull toward it. But go find a person who chose to smoke and kept choosing it for 10 or 20 years. They will invariably testify to the terrible strength of their present urge to smoke, even after witnessing the devastating impact of tobacco use on others (disease and death), even after they see their own choices degrading their health and taking great sums of money from them every year. It didn’t start out that way. Their choices reinforced and strengthened their urges.

How easy it is to be misled by the almost random experience of the world. We’re living in a perfect storm of unlimited options, offered enticingly, with full provocation of all the senses. The world hits our emotions like the glittering lights of the marquee, the sounds of carnival music, the fragrances of delicious foods and the sounds of human laughter. It all seems completely ungoverned, as though there were no central guiding force in the universe. And yet God waits patiently, in silence, for a chance to speak.

The reader may object to the Christian underpinnings here, but we don’t need to subscribe to a biblical faith in order to sort through this issue. Simple expediency bears out the message here. Our culture teaches us to surrender to our feelings, but are feelings destiny? Or is destiny what we choose? Emotions, too, grow stronger and more oppressive when we brood on them or follow them indiscriminately. Our best path is the one chosen through careful reasoning and wise reflection. Determinism (the belief that victorywe live at the mercy of our physical selves and our material environment, like a rubber duck carried on a stream of water) is a lie. People are beings with the capacity for reason. We are not animals. We experience, but we also choose. We ought to make the best choices we can, according to our knowledge, strength and ability.




About Douglas Abbott

I am a freelance writer by trade, philosopher and comedian by accident of birth. I am an assiduous observer of humanity and endlessly fascinated with people, the common elements that make us human, what motivates people and the fingerprint of God in all of us. I enjoy exploring the universe in my search for meaning, beauty and friendship. My writing is an extension of all these things and something I did for fun long before I ever got paid. My hope is that the reader will find in this portfolio a pleasing and inspiring literary hodgepodge. Good reading!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s